August - September 2024
Dashboard UI supporting academic mentors in task assignment and progress tracking.

Pembimbing.id is a dedicated academic mentoring dashboard designed to streamline the thesis supervision process for universities. Often, the thesis journey is plagued by lost emails, missed deadlines, and disorganized feedback. I designed this platform to bring order to the chaos, providing a centralized workspace where Lecturers can manage multiple students and Students can visualize their path to graduation.\n\nMy focus was on Information Architecture and Interaction Design. I analyzed the real-world workflows of professors and redesigned them into a digital format. The dashboard features a Kanban-style task board for tracking thesis chapters (Draft -> Review -> Approved), a unified feedback stream that keeps comments attached to specific document versions, and an automated calendar that syncs deadlines. This system shifts the focus from 'managing files' to 'mentoring students', improving the quality of academic guidance.
UI/UX Designer & Interaction Architect
August - September 2024
Figma, Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Photoshop
The main challenge was accommodating the widely varying styles of mentorship—some professors are hands-on, others are hands-off. The UI needed to be flexible enough to support strict workflows without feeling bureaucratic.
Academic mentoring is often managed through a messy mix of WhatsApp, email, and Google Drive. This fragmentation leads to students missing feedback and lecturers losing track of which draft they were supposed to review.
Feedback delivered via WhatsApp chat is easily lost and hard to reference later.
Filenames like 'Final_Final_v3.docx' confuse both students and mentors.
Students often feel stuck because they don't know 'what comes next' in the process.
Lecturers spend more time searching for files than actually reading and grading them.
Pembimbing.id brings the entire process under one roof. I designed a dashboard where the status of every chapter is visible at a glance, and communication is contextual—threaded directly to the work being discussed.
Comments are pinned to specific document submissions, so context is never lost.
A timeline view that shows students exactly where they are: 'Chapter 2 Approved, Chapter 3 Pending'.
Alerts that nudge users only when action is needed (e.g., 'New Draft Uploaded'), reducing noise.
A structured repository where every version is saved automatically, solving version control issues.
Interviewed 5 lecturers and 10 students to map out the 'Happy Path' and 'Pain Points' of the thesis process.
Created low-fidelity layouts to test different ways of organizing multiple students without clutter.
Developed a clean, professional UI kit that prioritized readability for long-form reading sessions.
Observed lecturers using the prototype to grade a mock submission, ensuring the flow was intuitive for non-tech-savvy users.